Debate links~ reply it !

Have you visited any links of the "Mickie Dees" so far?
Do you think that we can post the related links about the "Golden Arches" on this forum?
This may be something nice for our future debates, right?
I hope that this link can help, this can visit all the Mcdonalds in the WORLD!
I think we can find the food value or any things about the "Mickie Dees" here.
http://www.mcdonalds.com/

Post more links here ^^

http://www.mcdonalds.ca/en/food/index.aspx
Hope this is useful.

Also, the links posted in Mr. Bogarts website are also very useful.

http://www.mcspotlight.org/case/trial/verdict/verdict6_sum.html
I found one more ^^
this is the one which is the same website found by Mr.Bogart ,
but diff. topic ( according to Janice.).
I haven't read them all at this moment.

Here's another useful links, these are all about what's wrong with McDonald's:
http://www.converge.org.nz/hrag/apr3098.html
http://www.webeurope.co.uk/whats-wrong-with-mcdonalds.htm
http://www.zmag.org/zmag/articles/kovelsept97.htm
http://www.foodnotbombs.net/mcdonalds.pdf
http://www.breakingnewsenglish.com/0502/16.mcDonalds_mcLibel_2.html
http://www.spunk.org/texts/food/mcdonlds/sp000473.txt
http://www.nostatusquo.com/stopmcdonalds/index.html
These are all very useful to me, hope it will also help you guys.

Helen,

Thanks so much. That is just great!

I am looking forward to all of your debates!

Is there anything else I can do to help?

Mr.Bogart, Can this help to ask good question in the debates?
the questions are talking about obesity and Mc.donald's
http://www.makeupyourownmind.co.uk/questions/what-are-you-doing-about/obesity/#question6
other links:
http://www.utterpants.co.uk/news/science/mcdonalds.html

http://www.mercola.com/2006/feb/28/does_mcdonalds_have_any_other_health-harming_secrets_they_need_to_share.htm
(Health harming secrets hiding from McDonald's)

http://www.mcdonalds.com/app_controller.nutrition.index1.html
(a nutrition graph... you may find the data from this webpage.)

http://www.mercola.com/2004/oct/16/mcdonalds_promise.htm
(McDonald's promise is long forgotten!)

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/5300.html
(French fries contain much more trans fat than what we believed)

http://www.cspinet.org/new/archd.html
(McDonald's target Americans' heart)

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/08/health/main1299086.shtml
(One more website about French fries)

http://www.newsnet5.com/health/3993739/detail.html
(McDonald's in HOSPITALS?!)

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/22/business/yourmoney/22feed.html?ex=1342756800&en=50c43b181f987cbb&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
(McDonald's give in to temptation?)

Hope that the websites are useful !

May I ask how are we going to choose our representatives? Do we pick a group among the groups we have or we just pick individually? Or do we evaluate our classmates and pick the highest mark ones?

I think picking up a person individually is better. We need to pick the best 4 debaters in the group. If we choose them according to the marks, it is too inflexible. Sometimes someone really can speak out some incredible rebuttals or point of information may not get high marks. We can combine the debate points for the inter-group debate after the intra-group debate.

The link below provides you carlories content in fast food. See if that helps you in writing your speeches!
http://www.weightlossresources.co.uk/calories/calorie_counter/fast_food.htm

hey...escuse me, but what is MR. Bogart's website again? I saved this one but not the other one!

hey...escuse me, but what is MR. Bogart's website again? I saved this one but not the other one!

there u go!

THANK YOU

You can search wikipedia for info about Mc Donalds and all kinds of other stuff,
It's a pretty good website, but im not very sure about the acuratecy of it.!

Angel Chu wrote:I think picking up a person individually is better. We need to pick the best 4 debaters in the group. If we choose them according to the marks, it is too inflexible. Sometimes someone really can speak out some incredible rebuttals or point of information may not get high marks. We can combine the debate points for the inter-group debate after the intra-group debate.

WHAT?!?!?!? we are going to stay in our groups? .....even though we are chosen to go to that inter..or intra...class debate???

ccecherie wrote:

Angel Chu wrote:I think picking up a person individually is better. We need to pick the best 4 debaters in the group. If we choose them according to the marks, it is too inflexible. Sometimes someone really can speak out some incredible rebuttals or point of information may not get high marks. We can combine the debate points for the inter-group debate after the intra-group debate.

WHAT?!?!?!? we are going to stay in our groups? .....even though we are chosen to go to that inter..or intra...class debate???

I think we're choosing people individually... aren't we????

Mr. Bogart?? are we allowed to make changes to what we have said today?? cause what i have said today was a mess!!

p e gyyy yy! chu? wrote:

ccecherie wrote:

Angel Chu wrote:I think picking up a person individually is better. We need to pick the best 4 debaters in the group. If we choose them according to the marks, it is too inflexible. Sometimes someone really can speak out some incredible rebuttals or point of information may not get high marks. We can combine the debate points for the inter-group debate after the intra-group debate.

WHAT?!?!?!? we are going to stay in our groups? .....even though we are chosen to go to that inter..or intra...class debate???

I think we're choosing people individually... aren't we????

[ I HOPE ]

ccecherie wrote:Mr. Bogart?? are we allowed to make changes to what we have said today?? cause what i have said today was a mess!!

LOL Cherie, I don't think we're starting again, maybe you can work on your conclusion speech.!

We still have one group that hasn't complete the debate yet,,,, but for my group... we didn't have time to do the concluding speech... and the last speaker hasn't speak yet... so i think it'll be a bit difficult to do your part again... Cherie...

jelly wrote:We still have one group that hasn't complete the debate yet,,,, but for my group... we didn't have time to do the concluding speech... and the last speaker hasn't speak yet... so i think it'll be a bit difficult to do your part again... Cherie...

I have to go again tmr,,, I HAVE TO GO TWO TIMES!! WAHHH!

jelly wrote:We still have one group that hasn't complete the debate yet,,,, but for my group... we didn't have time to do the concluding speech... and the last speaker hasn't speak yet... so i think it'll be a bit difficult to do your part again... Cherie...

yea...but I asked mr bogart and he said we will be doing thiis all week!!
and we will have a chance to start over!!

jelly wrote:We still have one group that hasn't complete the debate yet,,,, but for my group... we didn't have time to do the concluding speech... and the last speaker hasn't speak yet... so i think it'll be a bit difficult to do your part again... Cherie...

do you think Mr Bogart remembers?

ccecherie wrote:

jelly wrote:We still have one group that hasn't complete the debate yet,,,, but for my group... we didn't have time to do the concluding speech... and the last speaker hasn't speak yet... so i think it'll be a bit difficult to do your part again... Cherie...

do you think Mr Bogart remembers?

DUHHHH@!!!
if he doesn't remember,
edith would definitely go and ask him
didn't you see how eager she was to debate?